Allern, M. (2001). It’s about showing your individual beauty. Tromsø: Universititet i Tromsø.
(2009-1). Introduksjon (revidert juni 2013). Fra Allern, M. Pedagogiske mapper på nett. http://www.uvett.uit.no/ilp/pm/kbase/intro.html
Anderson T. L. and Bodner G. M., (2007), What
can we do about “Parker”? A case study of a good student who didn’t “get” organic chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9(2), 93–101.
Anzovino M. E. and
Bretz S. L., (2015), Organic chemistry students’ ideas about nucleophiles and electrophiles: the role of charges and mechanisms, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 16, 797–810.
M. E. and Bretz S. L., (2016), Organic chemistry students’ fragmented ideas about the structure and function of nucleophiles and electrophiles: a concept map analysis, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 17, 1019–1029.
Bhattacharyya G., (2013), From source to sink: mechanistic reasoning using the electron-pushing formalism, J. Chem. Educ., 90(10), 1282–1289.
G., (2014), Trials and tribulations: student approaches and difficulties with proposing mechanisms using the electron-pushing formalism, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 15(4), 594–609
G. and Bodner G., (2005), “It Gets Me to the Product”: How Students Propose Organic Mechanisms, J. Chem. Educ., 82(9), 1402–1407.
Biggs, J. (1999). What the Student Does:
teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57-75.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. (2000) Chapter 1 “Learning: From Speculation to Science”.
In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown & R. R. Cocking, How people learn. National Academy Press Washington, DC.
Caspari, I, Weinrich, M. L., Sevian, H. and Graulich,
N. (2018) Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.,19, 42-59
Chi, M.T.H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., Lavancher, C. (1994)Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cogn Sci 18:439–477.
Cilliers, F. J. (2015) Is assessment good for learning or learning good
for assessment? A. Both? B. Neither? C. It depends? Perspect Med Educ. ; 4(6): 280–281.
Coleman EB, Brown AL, Rivkin ID (1997) The effect of instructional explanations on learning from
scientific texts. J Learn Sci 6:347–365
Cooper M. M., Grove N., Underwood S. M. and Klymkowsky M. W. (2010), Lost in Lewis structures: an investigation of student difficulties in developing
representational competence, J. Chem. Educ., 87(8), 869–874.
Coppola, B. P. (1997) "Progress in Practice: Organic Chemistry in the Introductory Course 2. The Advantages of Physical Organic Chemistry" Chem. Educator, 2 (2): S 1430-4171(97)02113-4.
Coppola, B. P. (2002) "Laboratory Instruction: Ensuring
an Active Learning Experience" In, McKeachie, W. J. McKeachie’s Teaching Tips (11 Ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, pp 235-244.
Coppola, B. P. (2010), “Structure and Reactivity
at the University of Michigan” In J. Ryan, T. Clark, & A. Collier (eds.). Assessment in the Disciplines (vol 5): Assessment in Chemistry. Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research; pp. 175-199.
Corrigan, H., and Craciun, G. (2013). Asking the right questions: Using Student-Written Exams as an innovative approach to learning and evaluation. Marketing Education Review, 23 (1), 31-35.
Dolan, E.L., Collins, J.P. (2015), Mol Biol Cell; 26(12):2151-5.
Ferguson R. and Bodner G. M., (2008), Making sense of the arrow-pushing formalism among chemistry
majors enrolled in organic chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, 102–113
Flynn A. B. and Featherstone R. B., (2017), Language of mechanisms: exam analysis reveals students' strengths,
strategies, and errors when using the electron-pushing formalism (curved arrows) in new reactions, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 18(1), 64–77.
Flynn A. B. and Ogilvie W. W., (2015), Mechanisms
before reactions: a mechanistic approach to the organic chemistry curriculum based on patterns of electron flow, J. Chem. Educ., 92(5), 803–810
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough,
M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M. P. (2014), PNAS, 111 (23) 8410-8415.
Grove N. P. and Bretz S. L., (2012), A continuum of learning: from rote memorization
to meaningful learning in organic chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13, 201–208.
Hansen, S.R. (2016) Hungarian-Norwegian Educational Project in Chemistry https://en.uit.no/om/enhet/aktuelt/nyhet?p_document_id=460376
Hope Corrigan & Georgiana Craciun (2013) Asking the Right Questions:Using Student-Written Exams as an Innovative Approach to Learning and Evaluation, MarketingEducation Review, 23:1, 31-36
Kelli R. Galloway , Carlee Stoyanovich and Alison B. Flynn Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2017, 18, 353-374
DL, Pangle WM, Wyatt KH, Powell KN, Sherwood RE (2014) Identifying key features of effective active learning: the effects of writing and peer discussion. CBE Life Sci Educ 13:469–477.
T. and Maskill, H. Organic Chemistry - A mechanistic approach.
Paulson, D. R. (1999)J. Chem. Educ., 76 (8), p 1136
M. M. (2015), Nature, 523, 272-274.
Wentland, S, H., (1994) J. Chem. Educ., 1994, 71 (1), p 3
Weimer M. 2015. Lastet
ned fra: https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/educational-assessment/student-written-exams-increase-student-involvement/
Rust, C. (2017) "Towards a scholarship of assessment" Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 229-237.
Sadler, D. R.
(2015) ”Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 1081-1099.
NT-fak: Strategi mot
2020 (vedtatt 03.06.2015). II. Visjon
Wiliam, D. (2011) ”What is assessment for learning?” Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14.
Meld. St. 18 (2012–2013), avsnitt 5.2.2 Studentaktiv forskning.